BCIS CapX provides a comprehensive, detailed and easy-to-use method of measuring cost movement for building and civil engineering. Widely used in the construction and infrastructure sector to help fairly allocate risk between the client and sub-contractors.
Published: 15/10/2026
The latest Industrial Strategy quarterly update(1) identifies investment in defence infrastructure, energy, manufacturing and specialist buildings. BCIS chief economist Dr David Crosthwaite examines what this could mean for construction and whether measures to improve delivery conditions are keeping pace.
The government’s latest Industrial Strategy update, covering July to September 2026, provides a clearer picture of the projects that could support future construction activity. It also records progress on industrial electricity costs, procurement and regional investment.
For construction, however, the distinction between investment announced and work delivered remains essential. A stronger pipeline can support business planning, but its economic value depends on projects being affordable, procurable and capable of progressing on site.
Investment is becoming more specific
Defence is a prominent feature of the 3Q2026 update. A £26 billion infrastructure programme to modernise Royal Navy naval bases points to substantial opportunities across Scotland, the South West and the Solent. Proposed maritime projects include new floating docks at HM Naval Base Clyde.
This is a more direct signal of potential construction demand than spending on defence equipment alone. Even so, the programme’s headline value does not tell contractors when individual packages will reach the market or which capabilities they will require.
Energy investment also extends beyond new generating capacity. The update records a £1.5 billion commitment to repower Whitelee windfarm and £800m to refurbish Sizewell B, extending the nuclear power station’s operating life to 2055.
These projects underline the economic importance of adapting and renewing existing assets. Extending operational life can require substantial construction and engineering work, with costs influenced by existing market conditions, access restrictions and the need to maintain operations.
Elsewhere, commitments include manufacturing facilities, battery storage, lithium processing and research buildings. DataVita’s £300 million investment covers expansion of an existing data centre and construction of a second in Lanarkshire, while GSK plans a £400 million research and development centre in Cambridge.
These are identifiable opportunities for the built environment. They should not, however, be treated as equivalent amounts of construction expenditure. Investment totals often include equipment, technology and other costs alongside buildings and infrastructure.
A stronger specialist pipeline can create uneven pressures
The strategy continues to concentrate investment in particular sectors and locations. That could support workloads for businesses with relevant experience, while leaving other parts of construction facing weaker demand.
It also means national market conditions may offer an incomplete guide to an individual project’s procurement environment.
Data centres, laboratories, nuclear facilities and defence infrastructure require different combinations of specialist skills, equipment and building services. Where programmes overlap, competition for those resources could increase even if construction activity overall remains subdued.
For clients and cost consultants, the practical question is which other projects are likely to compete for the same delivery capacity, in the same place and at the same time. Cost plans therefore need to reflect the project’s specification, location and procurement programme. A benchmark drawn from a different market or an earlier delivery date may need substantial adjustment.
Electricity support has moved forward
Applications for the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme opened on 1 October. The scheme is intended to reduce eligible manufacturers’ electricity costs by up to 25% from April 2027. Businesses confirmed as eligible for its first year will also receive an additional payment reflecting support they would have received had it operated earlier.
This is meaningful progress for eligible manufacturers facing high electricity costs. The additional payment also responds, in part, to concerns about the time taken to introduce support.
Its implications for construction, however, will depend on which suppliers qualify and how the benefits feed through. Eligibility is tied to specified sectors, products and electricity use, so support should not be assumed to cover all construction materials manufacturers.
Lower electricity bills could help eligible businesses invest, maintain production and strengthen their financial position, though they won’t necessarily produce an equivalent reduction in selling prices, which also reflect labour, raw materials, transport and market conditions. The effect on construction costs will need to be assessed through evidence from the supply chain.
Delivery reforms need to work together
The update records further planning measures, including reforms intended to support housing near well-connected stations and stronger mayoral powers over significant applications. It also includes the announcement of Great British Grid, intended to combine public and private investment to modernise the network and accelerate connections.
These measures address linked constraints. Planning permission has limited value to an industrial development if power cannot be connected when required. Equally, a faster connection will not resolve an unaffordable construction budget.
Public procurement changes place greater emphasis on jobs and skills. These could support workforce development, provided requirements are proportionate and give smaller businesses a workable route to participate.
The construction Jobs Plan, expected in the final quarter of 2026, will be another important test. Training provision needs to align with the projects coming forward, while employers need sufficient visibility of future work to justify recruitment.
Judge progress by projects reaching delivery
The latest update strengthens the case that the Industrial Strategy could support construction demand across several specialist markets. It gives the industry more detail about potential projects and records progress on some of the conditions needed to deliver them.
The next test is whether that detail becomes a dependable programme of procurement and construction.
Businesses need to understand project scope, funding mechanisms, delivery dates and opportunities within the supply chain. Clients need budgets that reflect the expected procurement environment and allow for changes in programme.
The strategy’s contribution to growth will ultimately depend on how effectively these elements come together. Tracking contracts awarded, projects starting and facilities entering use will provide a stronger measure of progress than investment commitments alone.
To keep up to date with the latest industry news and insights from BCIS register for our newsletter here.
